<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1154466707949783&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Contact Us Now

Why New FDA Guidelines Could Bring Big Changes to Pet Food Packaging

bigpetfoodbags.png

Today’s consumers are demanding transparency and accountability from all types of products, and pet food is no exception.

Greater scrutiny over pet food ingredients, and an increasing demand for responsibility, sustainability and complete transparency from pet food manufacturers is driving change within the industry. As the consumer demand for “clean” pet food labeling evolves as a major topic within the world of pet packaging, FDA guidelines are shifting.

pet-food-packaging

The pet food industry has been steadily working through revisions to their packaging and labeling guidelines for more than two years. The Pet Food Institute (PFI) and the Association of American Feed Officials Organization’s (AAFCO) first convened a task force in 2013, after consumer research was conducted in order to influence potential new pet food labeling rules to come from the FDA. The resulting research identified several sections of pet food labels that consumers found the most confusing and led to the formation of the AAFCO Pet Food Label Modernization Working Group.

The Pet Food Label Modernization Working Group consists of four sub-groups for areas identified by the research and chosen by AAFCO for improvement: the nutritional adequacy statement, guaranteed analysis, ingredients list and safety and handling statement. Of the four groups, proposals for new treatments of the nutritional adequacy statement and guaranteed analysis are progressing swiftly.

Currently, declaring that a pet food product is “complete and balanced” requires a statement on the package (usually on the back) that the product is “formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by AAFCO feeding trials for all life stages.”

Research has proven the content of these statements is confusing for most consumers, so AAFCO is currently working through a proposal to add a “graphic representation” of the statement in clearer language; the goal being to drop vague terms such as “growth” and “maintenance” from the proposed pet food labels.

Similarly, products that are not “complete and balanced” (such as treats or other supplemental pet food products) would bear a similar graphic indicating that they are for “supplemental feeding.” In both cases, the required graphic would be accompanied with a statement on the back of the package.

Consumer research has also identified the terms “crude protein” and “non-required ingredients” as problematic, because they confuse consumers and harbor negative connotations. To counteract this issue, The Pet Food Label Modernization Working Group is proposing dropping the “crude” term and adding a Nutrition Facts Box similar to the one seen on human food products.

The box would be labeled “Pet Nutrition Facts” to avoid confusion with human food labels, and would include the products intended use, along with a standard reference unit and a statement about the caloric density per unit. Similar to human food packaging labels, it would also list calories by percentages among major nutrient categories such as protein, fat and carbohydrates.

Many in the pet food packaging industry are concerned about when all these changes will occur. In all likelihood, the new labeling system is still far from being approved and implemented, since changes to the safety and handling statements and the ingredients list still need to be proposed.

Final changes to all four areas of the label would also need to be voted on and accepted by AAFCO’s Pet Food Committee and its board of directors. The changes would then need to be voted on by AAFCO’s general membership. Finally, because of the extensive nature of the proposed changes, AAFCO would need to allow for a reasonable compliance period, possibly up to three years.

No matter when these changes in the pet packaging industry do take place, the costs to pet food companies for changing all of their product labeling and pet food marketing could be drastic and time-consuming.

Pet food brands need to be informed, now, about the potential changes to pet food packaging guidelines and should partner, now with a packaging company that can help them through the process of modifying their packaging, efficiently.

A packaging partner who can help those in the pet packaging industry obtain either applied labels or redesigned custom-printed pouches, updated in advance, will help them avoid rushing to change their packaging once the FDA releases its deadlines for updated labels.  

Additional Reading:

New Call-to-action

Topics: Pet Product Packaging

Bridget O'Donnell

Written by Bridget O'Donnell

What LEGO’s Sustainable Packaging Teaches Us About Overseas Innovation

Since 1949, children across the globe have fawned over tiny, plastic, interlocking bricks.

LEGOs are a not only a classic toy but a staple in many households. Many kids beg their parents to take them to the majestic LEGOLAND, an amusement park where all their wishes and dreams could come true.

Why Nestlé, Unilever & PepsiCo are Banning Oxo-degradable Plastic Packaging

Originally marketed as an eco-friendly packaging material, new evidence regarding the potentially negative impact of oxo-degradable plastics has led a number of companies and governments to restrict their use.

More than 150 companies and global organizations, including Nestlé, Unilever and PepsiCo, have recently endorsed a total ban on the material in light of its potentially negative environmental impact.

Oxo-degradable plastic packaging, which includes select plastic pouch bags, is often marketed as a solution to plastic pollution because it claims to degrade into harmless residues within a period ranging from a few months to several years. However, oxo-degradable plastics do not degrade into harmless residues, but instead, fragment into tiny shards of plastic that actually contribute to plastic pollution.

Often, consumers think that because a material is biodegradable, it can be composted or even littered on the ground, because, it is thought, the material will break down into nothing over time. This actually ends up leading to an increase in pollution, since consumers don’t end up recycling or repurposing the material, and misconceptions about how the plastic will degrade leads them to end up putting it back into landfills.

What is important to note in this case is that although oxo-degradable plastics are biodegradable, being biodegradable does not necessarily mean that a material is eco-friendly. Although these plastics do break down over time, the tiny pieces they break down into are still plastics that contribute to pollution — they do not degrade into nothing or into another usable substance.

For companies looking to make the switch to sustainable packaging, it is important to consider that sustainable packaging does not necessarily mean biodegradable packaging, and vice versa.

Why New FDA Guidelines Could Bring Big Changes to Pet Food Packaging

Today’s consumers are demanding transparency and accountability from all types of products, and pet food is no exception.

Greater scrutiny over pet food ingredients, and an increasing demand for responsibility, sustainability and complete transparency from pet food manufacturers is driving change within the industry. As the consumer demand for “clean” pet food labeling evolves as a major topic within the world of pet packaging, FDA guidelines are shifting.

>