<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1154466707949783&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Contact Us Now

What Campbell’s Can Teach Us About Clean Label Packaging

GMO Labels

To maintain longevity and customer loyalty in today’s fast-changing world, classic brands must strike a careful balance between embracing innovation and staying true to their roots.

People become devoted brand ambassadors when they feel like the product is working to benefit them as individuals and the company is listening to their unique concerns and desires. Major consumer packaged goods brands are making customer feedback a key part of their strategies and culture, and Campbell’s is one iconic company making great strides in this arena. The brand walks that fine line between reinvention and maintaining its classic branding while successfully maneuvering its product line in a way that solves a problem and appeals to today’s modern consumer.

When soup sales were on the decline, Campbell’s took a major risk by packaging many of its new products in stand up pouches, rather than the iconic tin can, which ultimately proved to be a wise decision. The company also acquired several organic food and beverage brands to build its clean-label image and update its organic food packaging to appeal to a younger, savvy generation of shoppers.

Now, the company is once again placing its attention on its product packaging and is making an even more dramatic change. GMO labeling on food and beverage packaging has been a hotly contested issue between consumers and manufacturers alike — a whopping 92 percent of Americans support GMO labeling, while a large number of food and beverage companies have expressed concerns about including this information on their products. Now, Campbell’s is establishing itself as the only major CPG company to publicly announce its stance on the issue.

Campbell's Stand Up Pouch

The company formally declared it will include clear, simple labeling on all of its product packaging that indicates whether or not the item has been produced with genetically modified ingredients. This is a major shift from the company’s former stance on the issue (strongly opposing mandatory GMO labels), but as the brand is responds to consumer desires, advocating for federal legislation requiring all food and beverage companies to include a GMO label on their packaging aligns with the companies goals and objectives for the new year.

Most of the food industry has opposed a mandatory law requiring this information on its packaged goods, as fears about whether or not these labels will push customers away still persist. However, as Kellogg weighs in to Food Navigator on the issue, “transparency is more than just a label,” and it’s up to today’s brands to be as communicative as possible to customers about what ingredients are used in their products and where they come from. Companies have the option to remove genetically engineered items from their product’s recipes, and this will result in clean label packaging that has the potential to attract new customers searching for organic, additive-free food and beverages.

Campbell’s stance on this issue could be considered a potentially game changing development in the GMO labeling debate throughout the United States. If no federal law is passed, the company promises to privately label all of its products with guidance from the DA and approval from the USDA.

This shows consumers that a major brand isn’t afraid to move ahead of U.S. regulators and break ranks with peers. It communicates the ever-important values of transparency and respect customers seek out in the companies they purchase from.

Rather than worrying about losing customers because of a small label on its product packaging (or viewing the label as a “warning”), Campbell’s is working to make it easier for other companies to comply with regulations and for consumers to flock to those amazing products that are wholesome and nutritious.

Currently, the U.S. is full of state-by-state labeling requirements that create unnecessary confusion for consumers. To bypass this, brands have the option to follow Campbell’s lead by privately labeling their food packaging or reformulate their products to exclude GMOs. With so many new options available, companies can overhaul their goods in exciting, inventive ways with organic food packaging that is good for the environment and maintains the high quality of the product inside. Clean label packaging can mark a new era for brands, and changing up product packaging to account for the profound transformation in the way Americans consumer food and beverages is a step toward a greater future.

 
(Image Sources: Genetic Literacy Project, The Krazy Coupon Lady)

Health Food Packaging

Related Posts:

How New GMO Food Labeling Regulations Affect Your Retail Packaging

Should You Use Stand Up Pouches for Clean Label Products?

Will Your Product Packaging Survive the Food Revolution?

Brittany Nader

Written by Brittany Nader

What LEGO’s Sustainable Packaging Teaches Us About Overseas Innovation

Since 1949, children across the globe have fawned over tiny, plastic, interlocking bricks.

LEGOs are a not only a classic toy but a staple in many households. Many kids beg their parents to take them to the majestic LEGOLAND, an amusement park where all their wishes and dreams could come true.

Why Nestlé, Unilever & PepsiCo are Banning Oxo-degradable Plastic Packaging

Originally marketed as an eco-friendly packaging material, new evidence regarding the potentially negative impact of oxo-degradable plastics has led a number of companies and governments to restrict their use.

More than 150 companies and global organizations, including Nestlé, Unilever and PepsiCo, have recently endorsed a total ban on the material in light of its potentially negative environmental impact.

Oxo-degradable plastic packaging, which includes select plastic pouch bags, is often marketed as a solution to plastic pollution because it claims to degrade into harmless residues within a period ranging from a few months to several years. However, oxo-degradable plastics do not degrade into harmless residues, but instead, fragment into tiny shards of plastic that actually contribute to plastic pollution.

Often, consumers think that because a material is biodegradable, it can be composted or even littered on the ground, because, it is thought, the material will break down into nothing over time. This actually ends up leading to an increase in pollution, since consumers don’t end up recycling or repurposing the material, and misconceptions about how the plastic will degrade leads them to end up putting it back into landfills.

What is important to note in this case is that although oxo-degradable plastics are biodegradable, being biodegradable does not necessarily mean that a material is eco-friendly. Although these plastics do break down over time, the tiny pieces they break down into are still plastics that contribute to pollution — they do not degrade into nothing or into another usable substance.

For companies looking to make the switch to sustainable packaging, it is important to consider that sustainable packaging does not necessarily mean biodegradable packaging, and vice versa.

Why New FDA Guidelines Could Bring Big Changes to Pet Food Packaging

Today’s consumers are demanding transparency and accountability from all types of products, and pet food is no exception.

Greater scrutiny over pet food ingredients, and an increasing demand for responsibility, sustainability and complete transparency from pet food manufacturers is driving change within the industry. As the consumer demand for “clean” pet food labeling evolves as a major topic within the world of pet packaging, FDA guidelines are shifting.

>