<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1154466707949783&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Compact banner showing a calculator, pallet icon, and a spouted pouch next to a bottle.

True Cost Breakdown of Flexible Liquid Pouches

Understand how materials, energy, freight, and storage drive total landed cost—and why liquid pouches often win. For context, see the Cost & Efficiency Benefits pillar.

ESTIMATE MY PROJECT COST
Manufacturing line producing flexible liquid pouches for beverages and sauces.

Why Pouches Deliver a Financial Edge

Compared to bottles or cans, flexible liquid pouches use less material, store flatter, and ship lighter. Those efficiencies compound across millions of units—turning packaging into a competitive advantage. Explore the macro picture in the pillar guide.

Where the Savings Come From

  • Material: Up to 70% less plastic than rigid packaging.
  • Freight: Flat, lightweight cases reduce loads and fuel.
  • Storage: Higher pallet density cuts warehouse costs.
  • Energy: Lower forming/molding heat and cycle times.
  • Secondary Packaging: Less corrugate and void fill.
Icons for material, freight, storage, energy, and secondary packaging savings in pouches.
Table comparing unit price vs total landed cost across packaging lifecycle stages.

Total Landed Cost Beats Unit Price

Rigid containers can look cheaper on a per-unit basis, but once you add freight, storage, damages, and returns, pouches often provide the lowest total cost. See a full methodology in the pillar.

Illustrative Case: From Bottles to Pouches

  • Packaging costs cut by 35%
  • Shipping weight reduced by 60%
  • Pallet density increased by 40%
  • CO₂ in logistics down 25%

Explore more outcomes in our case studies and the pillar overview.

Chart showing percentage reductions in cost, weight, and emissions after switching to liquid pouches.

Model your total landed cost with our team—or scan the big picture in the pillar guide.

ESTIMATE MY PROJECT COST